Why climate change will be a doubly tough issue for a President Hillary Clinton
Between Barack Obama's assertiveness and the GOP's recalcitrance, what's left for Clinton?
While the Republican candidates for president are tearing their hair out trying to figure out how they can deal with a bizarrely formidable Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has the luxury of rolling out policy ideas on her own schedule. This week she debuted another one: an ambitious increase in the nation's supply of renewable energy, meant to make a dent in American carbon emissions. In keeping with her previous policy proposals, there's plenty to please liberals. But there are real questions about how she'd go about achieving her goals.
The Clinton campaign says it will be rolling out her climate plans in stages; this first part is about clean energy. Clinton proposes to increase the nation's solar capacity by 700 percent by 2020, and to generate enough renewable energy by 2027 to power every home in America. As Brad Plumer points out, electricity generation accounts for only 38 percent of carbon emissions, so that doesn't solve the whole problem, but it's still an extremely ambitious goal.
The details on how to get to that goal are thin at this point — a "Solar X-Prize," tax incentives, use of public land for renewable energy generation — but the real question may be not whether you could devise a specific plan to get there, but whether such a plan could be put into action. No matter how serious Clinton is about this issue, as president she'd face an uphill climb.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That's partly because the Obama administration has already taken many of the executive actions readily available to deal with climate change. The administration set ambitious new fuel efficiency standards for cars, capped carbon emissions from power plants (limits that Clinton has said "must be protected at all costs"), and struck a deal with China to reduce carbon pollution. It is readying a new round of regulations on emissions from airplanes, trucks, and oil and natural gas operations. It just announced that it had recruited major corporations like Microsoft, General Motors, and Walmart to pledge to reduce their carbon emissions. And that's not to mention the fact that the 2009 Recovery Act (aka the stimulus) was, among other things, the largest clean energy bill in American history.
There are plenty of climate hawks who say that while this record is pretty good, it pales before the magnitude of the challenge. Which is probably true. But it also means that Clinton will have be creative if she wants to go far beyond what the Obama administration has done, particularly through regulation.
The other reason this is a challenging issue for Clinton is that she'll likely be facing a Republican Congress if she's elected president. Although significant numbers of Republican voters accept the reality of climate change, the default position for politicians in the party is that while the planet may or may not be getting warmer, we certainly shouldn't do anything about it. Of the 16 Republicans running for president, only one — Lindsey Graham — actually thinks it's an issue worth addressing. The positions of the rest of them range from "I'm not a scientist" to "It's a big hoax."
The Republicans in Congress are no better. If a President Clinton were very lucky, she might have a Democratic Senate to deal with, but she'll still certainly face a Republican House. That means that the likelihood of significant climate legislation reaching her desk is near zero. Most of what she's proposing would require legislation. How is she going to get Republicans to agree to it?
Of course, that's a question that hangs over anything Clinton (or any other Democrat) proposes. Perhaps it's not fair at this point to demand an answer — we can start by learning exactly what she'd like to do, and then we can figure out whether she can do it. But when you're talking about an issue like this one, where resistance from Republicans will be strong, it's impossible to avoid.
On the other hand, maybe Republicans will join with a President Clinton to safeguard the planet's future — especially when doing so could produce untold numbers of jobs and a variety of other benefits to the economy and Americans' health. Probably not, though.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Why au pairs might become a thing of the past
Under The Radar Brexit and wage ruling are threatening the 'mutually beneficial arrangement'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
'A direct, protracted war with Israel is not something Iran is equipped to fight'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 17, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - political anxiety, jury sorting hat, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published