What the GOP can learn from Democrats' ObamaCare failures
Lesson number one: Commit to a plan for reform and stick to it
Republicans are finally playing for keeps on ObamaCare. Now that they actually have the power to make President Obama's controversial health-care law disappear if they so choose, they're getting closer than ever before to the second half of "repeal and replace."
But after dozens of votes to repeal and almost as many competing ideas of how to replace ObamaCare, congressional Republicans are being urged to avoid repeating the Democrats' mistakes in drafting the law in the first place. Don't overpromise. Don't be too disruptive of people's existing health-care arrangements while promising nothing will change. Be transparent about costs and restrained in restructuring such a large segment of the American economy.
These are all good suggestions. But the Democrats of eight years ago deserve credit for one thing: They committed to a vision of health-care reform and stuck with it regardless of the political cost. Republicans have been unwilling to do this, perhaps until now.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The political price for the Democrats' steadfastness has been steep. Looming over President Obama's farewell tour is the fact that his party has taken a beating in down-ballot races during his time in office. ObamaCare isn't the only reason, but it's a big one. When the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, Democrats enjoyed big majorities in both houses of Congress. Today, they are minorities in both houses.
As unpopular as ObamaCare has been, Republicans know they, too, could pay a steep political price in scrapping it. They were reminded of that during House Speaker Paul Ryan's CNN town hall last week, when a Republican got up and said ObamaCare had saved his life. Ryan handled the question well, but he is more articulate — and has more defined domestic-policy views — than your average House or Senate Republican. How many of them want to face constituents at town halls back home and have to say they repealed a life-saving law? Do Republicans really want to own all the problems in the country's health-care system?
So far, the evidence suggests the answer is no. That's a big reason why Republicans have avoided settling on an ObamaCare alternative for years. Just weeks ago, it looked as if they were going to once again repeal ObamaCare more or less symbolically while kicking the can down the road on replacement. And indeed, "repeal and delay" might have carried the day, except that President-elect Trump, who knows next to nothing about health-care policy, intuitively grasps that a gap between repealing and replacing the law is a political catastrophe waiting to happen. During a press conference last week, he said he wanted to see the law repealed and replaced "essentially simultaneously."
Unfortunately for Republicans, the new titular head of the party doesn't appear to have thought much about the issue beyond that, and won many voters of the "keep the government out of my Medicare" variety. Trump hasn't done anything to prepare these supporters, much less the nation, for retrenchment of the Medicaid expansion or any other entitlement. It certainly doesn't help when he promises the GOP's replacement plan will boast "insurance for everybody."
But cooler Republican heads understand that killing ObamaCare is politically perilous. Even the ill-fated effort to "defund" ObamaCare in 2013 was partially premised on the notion that once the law's subsidies kicked in, it would become impossible to replace without enraging Americans who had come to count on ObamaCare's benefits. Thus ObamaCare foes as staunch as Ted Cruz appeared to lack confidence that their health-care vision could carry the day unless they resorted to kamikaze missions before it fully took effect.
So what can Republicans do now?
From the time of the defeat of Bill and Hillary Clinton's health-care reform plan in the 1990s up until ObamaCare, the GOP barely coped with public anxieties about America's health-care system. They mainly just went along with low-budget knock-offs of Democratic plans with a handful of more market-based features cribbed from conservative think tanks: Kennedy-Kassebaum, the State Children Health Insurance Program, the deficit-funded Medicare Part D and, most ominously, RomneyCare.
If Republicans were never going to make the case for better functioning markets in health care versus more government direction, the issue was always going to be resolved on Democratic terms. In some respects, ObamaCare's unworkable mix of mandates, regulations, and subsidies represented a compromise between these two competing visions in spite of the GOP.
But it was not a sustainable compromise. Republicans have a chance to implement free-market health-care reform and forestall something closer to single-payer. But will they be willing to risk their fragile majorities to do so, as the Democrats who passed ObamaCare did?
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
5 sleeper hit cartoons about Trump's struggles to stay awake in court
Cartoons Artists take on courtroom tranquility, war on wokeness, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The true story of Feud: Capote vs. The Swans
In depth The writer's fall from grace with his high-flying socialite friends in 1960s Manhattan is captured in a new Disney+ series
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
Scottie Scheffler: victory for the 'pre-eminent golfer of this era'
Why Everyone's Talking About Masters victory is Scheffler's second in three years
By The Week Staff Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published