Trump, Rosenstein, and the inevitable end of the Mueller probe
The endgame is upon us
Rod Rosenstein's near-miss almost-exit from the Department of Justice on Monday should make clear an important fact: Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of President Trump is now in a race against time.
It may already be too late to save the special counsel investigation. After all, Rosenstein will meet with President Trump on Thursday, and it's possible he'll leave the White House without a job.
If that happens, it means that the ultimate crisis of the Trump administration — which has seemingly been a series of fresh crises every news cycle — is finally at hand. We are about to find out whether the president or the rule of law has primacy in this country.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Things are bound to get ugly.
Why are we here? Because The New York Times reported on Friday that Rosenstein — never a favorite of Trump's — had discussed secretly recording Trump and even considered an attempt to oust the president using the 25th Amendment. Rosenstein denied the report, but the damage was clearly done.
The ramifications, of course, go far beyond Rosenstein's job status.
Rosenstein has been overseeing Mueller's investigation of possible collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign, a responsibility he took on when Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forced to recuse himself from the matter. Nobody expects the attorney general to keep his job long after November's midterm elections. Trump would almost certainly expect the new AG to curtail Mueller's activities, if not bring them to a complete halt.
That has at least given Mueller some breathing room for his investigation, a clearly marked end date to work against. Rosenstein's exit would speed up the timeline.
In his absence, the overseeing of Mueller would likely fall to Solicitor General Noel Francisco, who has argued that the president has expansive power to fire executive branch employees if he chooses. Given that outlook — and President Trump's own clear preferences in the matter — it seems probable Francisco would, at the very least, hobble Mueller's probe.
That would be the turning point.
It should be astonishing that the president could and would order an end to the investigation of his activities. During normal times, that would be a signal to Congress to step forward and exercise its check-and-balance role on the White House, either through impeachment or some other method. The Republican-held House and Senate, however, have long since demonstrated their disinterest in restraining Trump.
Which means that if Mueller is sidelined, it will fall to voters in November — and whether they choose to replace those GOP majorities — to make the ultimate decision about Trump's fate.
There are those who will argue that Rosenstein's exit would amount to the Trump administration's version of the "Saturday Night Massacre," when Richard Nixon tried to undermine the Watergate investigation by firing a special prosecutor, only to cause the attorney general and deputy attorney general to resign.
But the truth is that the Trump administration has been All Massacre, All The Time since the Russia investigation began. The Department of Justice leadership has been undermined and decapitated by the president ever since — the firings of FBI Director James Comey and, later, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, the constant public belittling of Sessions, and his clear contempt for Rosenstein have brought us to this moment. We don't yet know if Trump's attempt to restock the DOJ with loyalists has had its desired effect, but the intent is nonetheless clear.
If there's reason for hope in all of this, it's that Trump — by so nakedly acting in his own service instead of the country's — has made heroes and sympathetic figures of men who might otherwise be poorly judged by history. Comey, after all, helped swing the election to Trump with his ill-considered comments about Hillary Clinton in the waning days of the 2016 campaign; Rosenstein wrote the tendentious memo that Trump used to justify firing Comey. Sessions, if not for his role in the Russia matter, would be remembered as a chief architect of Trump's brutal immigration policies.
But all three men have held the line against Trump's efforts to meddle in the Russia investigation — and each has paid a price for doing so. In this era where we're inclined to see our political rivals as our enemies, it's helpful to look upon Comey, Sessions, and Rosenstein and see that they're human: They may not always do their jobs well, or they may have awful political ideas, but they do seem to have demonstrated moral integrity in the face of pressure. That's something to be admired, isn't it?
If so, let's hope we're not admiring martyrs to the rise of Trump. Instead, we should want the possible end of Rosenstein's Justice Department career to mark the moment when the rule of law reasserted itself against the designs of small, selfish men.
Either way, it looks like the endgame is finally afoot.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Olympics 2024: is Paris ready to party?
Talking Point Build-up to this summer's Games 'marred' by rows over national identity, security and pollution
By The Week UK Published
-
Solo travel: the 'ultimate indulgence in 2024'
The Week Recommends Why more of us are choosing to go on holiday on our own
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'Stormy Monday for Don'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
US, Israel brace for Iran retaliatory strikes
Speed Read An Iranian attack on Israel is believed to be imminent
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How green onions could swing South Korea's election
The Explainer Country's president has fallen foul of the oldest trick in the campaign book, not knowing the price of groceries
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine's battle to save Kharkiv from Putin's drones
The Explainer Country's second-largest city has been under almost daily attacks since February amid claims Russia wants to make it uninhabitable
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
India elections 2024: the logistics of world's biggest vote
The Explainer More than 10% of the world's population is registered for a historic democratic exercise, with PM Modi likely to dominate again
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Erdogan set back in key regional elections
Speed Read The main opposition party flipped or held Turkey's biggest cities, including Istanbul
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Cubans rally for 'power and food' in rare protests
Speed Read The protests came after 18-hour rolling blackouts and food supply shortages
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Iran at the crossroads: have the mullahs lost their grip?
In Depth Iranian voters delivered a 'stinging rebuke' to the regime in parliamentary elections
By The Week UK Published