How to make Trump leave office peacefully
Impeachment could get ugly. There is a better option.
For most of the last year it has seemed like the impeachment of President Trump, if it ever happened, would be an exercise in futility. The Democrat-led House would vote to impeach him. The Republican-held Senate would almost certainly vote to reject the impeachment charges. Trump, having survived a serious threat to his presidency, would ride into his 2020 re-election effort on a wave of martyrdom.
As they say on Twitter: Life comes at you fast.
The latest Fox News poll — Fox News! — suggests that most Americans want to see Trump impeached and removed from office. And Trump's stalwart Republican allies are looking a little bit less stalwart since he gave Turkey the green light to invade northern Syria. Suddenly, there are cracks in the armor that has protected this president for so long. Is it really possible Trump could be forced from office before the end of his term?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Maybe. But it might take a deal to get there. Perhaps letting Trump exit office of his own accord rather than allowing the impeachment process play out to its natural conclusion is both preferable and possible.
Trump has long fancied himself the ultimate dealmaker, and while that reputation is almost certainly overblown, appealing to his vanity might actually benefit the republic. Given a choice between being removed from office and a deal that lets him save face — or, at least, stay out of jail — there is a good chance that Trump could take the latter option, then proclaim victory in public.
Given the growing mounds of evidence against him, however, Democrats probably won't want to let Trump off the hook so easily. Trump's critics will want him to pay, legally and socially, and understandably so.
But it still might be better to make a deal.
Remember: No president has ever been removed from office by impeachment. Two presidents — Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton — were impeached but survived their Senate trials. Another, Richard Nixon, resigned from office just ahead of an impeachment vote he knew he would lose. America has never seen the presidential impeachment process all the way through. That path is uncharted, and possibly treacherous.
The indications are, after all, that Trump will do everything he can to make impeachment a costly and painful process for the country. He has instructed his aides — even those who don't work directly for the White House — not to cooperate with House inquiries. On Tuesday, his lawyer sent a letter to congressional leaders, rejecting the legitimacy of the impeachment effort entirely.
That raises questions about the impeachment endgame. Who is to say that Trump would even accept a Senate vote to remove him from office? And if he didn't, what would happen then? Nixon left office, in part, because he saw the writing on the wall — but also because he believed doing so was best for the country. "As president, I must put the interest of America first. America needs a full-time president and a full-time Congress," Nixon said in his resignation speech. It's difficult to imagine Trump acting so selflessly. What happens to America's democratic self-perception if the president — hypothetically speaking — has to be literally dragged from the Oval Office, kicking and screaming? Could our system of governance survive such a scenario?
It might be better for America not to find out the answers to any of these questions. It might be worth a deal just to short-circuit the trouble Trump can make in the normal course of events. As TPM's Josh Marshall suggested, Trump's recent decision to pull U.S. troops out of northern Syria and allow Turkish troops in will have deadly consequences, and it was "about lashing out over impeachment and the president proving he has the power to inflict harm. It's only the beginning."
Right now, Trump has every incentive to fight to hold office, no matter what. Staying in office keeps federal prosecutors at bay, and it creates opportunities for his business. From his point of view, there are probably no incentives to leave honorably or peacefully, even if it is clear that his support has evaporated completely. A deal would probably look a little bit like the pardon Nixon received from his successor, President Gerald Ford, that shielded him from prosecution from his presidential crimes.
Ford paid a political price for issuing that pardon, losing the next election to Jimmy Carter. Any congressional leader cutting such a deal with Trump might pay a similar price, as they should. It wouldn't be right for Trump to escape punishment for his wrongdoing. But it might be preferable to letting him continue to unleash chaos from the Oval Office.
It is too early in the impeachment process to try to cut a deal with Trump, and if Senate Republicans do stay united, as originally expected, then this speculation is all for naught. But it's never too early to start thinking about the endgame — and to be ready, when the time comes, to make a deal.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Putin's sham election
Opinion Protest votes show Russian dissent still simmers
By Susan Caskie Published
-
6 inviting homes with rental units
Feature Featuring a restored Victorian home in Illinois and ocean-view windows in Nova Scotia
By The Week Staff Published
-
Keith O'Brien's 6 must-read books about significant moments in sports history
Feature The best-selling author recommends works by Laura Hillenbrand, Jonathan Eig and more
By The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published